|
|
| Catalog Number |
222722 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
11/16/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This is report 2 of 2 for (b)(4).It was reported by the healthcare professional in china that during a left calcaneal osteotomy and fixation procedure on (b)(6) 2023, it was observed that the 4.9 healix adv sp peek ce device was broken off.All the broken parts were removed.Changed to another one to continue with the surgery, when tightened the fastin rc anchor with ethibond w/needles broke off.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary = the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received.Visual observations revealed that the inserter does not show structural anomalies, also only the inserter without anchor or suture was returned.Also, foreign material was noted in the shaft at the distal part, biological matter.As the suture was not returned for evaluation: therefore, this complaint cannot be confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.Based on that the suture was not returned, this complaint cannot be confirmed.A possible root cause for the issue experienced by the customer can be attributed to the procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure, however, this cannot be conclusively determined.As per instructions for use, use instructions are provided.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|