• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INBONE TALAR DOME SZ 2 SULCUS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INBONE TALAR DOME SZ 2 SULCUS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 220220902
Medical Device Problem Codes Osseointegration Problem (3003); Migration (4003)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Date of Event 11/06/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery due to tibial tray and talus showing collapse.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Once the investigation has been completed any additional information will be reported in a supplemental report.H3 other text : device remains implanted in patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could be confirmed, based on available medical records and assessment of health care professionals.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Upon further investigation of the ct scans by healthcare professionals the following was observed: after reviewing hcp opinion and surgeon¿s feedback we can conclude that the tibial component shows clear radiolucence , small cysts and subsidence.Therefore, loosening and migration can be confirmed.Talar components smaller radiolucence around the pegs and little bit of condensed bone at the posterior implant.The overall bone quality is reduced.Loosening can be confirmed, but there is no clear sign of migration.Based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to a patient related issue.The failure is detected by the radiolucence ,cavities around tibial and talar components.As a result, subsidence is observed in tibial part while loosening may occurred in talar component.If device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
 
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery due to tibial tray and talus showing collapse.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INBONE TALAR DOME SZ 2 SULCUS
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key18239076
Report Number3010667733-2023-00730
Device Sequence Number6983364
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00840420124210
UDI-Public00840420124210
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K100886
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/26/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number220220902
Device Lot Number1689221
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/06/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/03/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/30/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/26/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/15/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-