| Catalog Number |
M0036121040 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/08/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The subject coil was returned for analysis and the device investigation revealed that the subject coil was broken/fractured during use.The subject device was replaced, and the procedure was completed successfully.No clinical consequences were reported to the patient due to this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Due to the automated manufacturing execution system (mes) system there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.During visual inspection the coil delivery wire was seen to be kinked.The main coil was seen to be stretched and the main coil suture was damaged.The main coil was also seen to be broken fractured as the tip ball was not present.The introducer sheath was not returned.Functional inspection was not required.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported event was confirmed based on analysis.The device failed to meet specifications when received for complaint investigation based on the analyzed anomalies noted to the device.Additional information provided by the customer is the device was prepared for use as per the dfu.There was no damage noted to the packaging prior to opening the packaging.The device was confirmed to be in good condition during preparation/ prior to use on the patient.Continuous flush was set up and maintained throughout the clinical procedure.The patient¿s anatomy tortuosity was average.An assignable cause of procedural factors will be assigned to the reported event ¿main coil stretched' as these defects appears to be associated with a product that met stryker design and manufacturing specifications and was used in accordance with the dfu, but performance was limited due to procedural factors during use.An assignable cause of procedural factors will be assigned to the analysed events ¿main coil stretched and ¿main coil suture damage¿ and ¿main coil broken/fractured during use ' as these defects appears to be associated with a product that met stryker design and manufacturing specifications and was used in accordance with the dfu, but performance was limited due to procedural factors during use.An assignable cause of 'handling damage' will be assigned to the analysed event ¿coil delivery wire kinked/bent¿ as the defect appears to be associated with handling of the product or portion of the product during preparation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|