|
|
| Catalog Number |
ET309522 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Intracranial Hemorrhage (1891); Ischemia Stroke (4418)
|
| Date of Event |
09/28/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient date of birth was not provided.Section e.1: the name, phone and email address of the initial reporter are not available / reported.Based on complaint information, the device is not available to be returned for analysis.A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (23d144av) top and sub assembly presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no non-conformances related to device manufacture or inspection.Cerebral hemorrhage and cerebral infarction are both known potential complications associated with the use of the embotrap iii device and are listed in the instructions for use (ifu) as such.There were no alleged quality issues related to the device used, as the device performed as intended.Although the pi assessed the event as unrelated to the study device, unrelated to the large bore catheter, and unrelated to the surgical procedure, the event occurred the day after the procedure.Additionally, it is unknown if there were any device deficiencies during the procedure.Further information will have to be obtained regarding the location of the event, as it relates to the location the device was used.Currently, the relationship between the devices and the adverse event of ¿hemorrhagic infarction¿ cannot be ruled out completely.Based on this information, this event will be conservatively reported to the us fda reporting under criteria 21 cfr 803 with a classification of ¿serious injury.¿ the file will be re-reviewed if additional information is received at a later date.Based on the review of the manufacturing documentation, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.This information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The event was reported via the excellent study, the 66-year-old female patient with a history of atrial fibrillation and hyperlipidemia, presented with a witnessed stroke on (b)(6) 2023 at 21:30 hour.The patient was presented to the treating hospital on (b)(6) 2023 at 22:53 hour, where magnetic resonance imaging (mri) imaging confirmed an ischemic stroke.Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tpa) was not administered.The suspected origin of the embolism was cardioembolic.The patient¿s baseline nih stroke scale (nihss) score was 12 and a modified rankin scale (mrs) score was 0 ¿ no symptoms.The patient underwent an endovascular mechanical thrombectomy on (b)(6) 2023 using a 5mm x 22mm embotrap iii revascularization device (et309522 / 23d144av) that targeted an occlusion in the left m3 of the middle cerebral artery (mca).The pre-pass modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mtici) score was 0.The first pass was made with the embotrap iii via a trevo trak 21 microcatheter (stryker) resulted in an mtici score of 2c with clot retrieval.It was not known if there was any intra-operative device deficiency with study device during the procedure.The patient¿s 24-hour post-procedure nihss score was 6.On 28-sep-2023, the patient experienced a hemorrhagic infarction which was made known to the site on the same day and made known to the sponsor on (b)(6) 2023.The principal investigator (pi) assessed this event as not serious, mild in severity, and as unrelated to the embotrap iii study device, unrelated to the large bore catheter, and unrelated to the primary surgical procedure.The event was treated with medication.The outcome is recorded as ¿recovered/resolved¿ with an end date of (b)(6) 2023.On (b)(6) 2023, the patient¿s seven-day post procedure assessment was done which resulted in a nihss score of 4 and a mrs score of ¿3-moderate disability.Requires some help, but able to walk without assistance.¿ the patient¿s discharge information was not entered into the database.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to include the additional event information received on 08-jan-2024.[additional information]: on 08-jan-2024, additional information was received.Per the information, the reported hemorrhagic infarction was at the same site where the study device was used.There was no vessel trauma / injury that resulted in the hemorrhagic infarction.There was no device performance issue as related to the embotrap iii device.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to include the additional event information received on 26-feb-2024.[additional information]: on 26-feb-2024, modified information was received.The modified information is related to the severity of the adverse event left putamen hemorrhagic infarction.The severity of the event has been updated from ¿mild¿ to ¿moderate.¿ the manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|