| Catalog Number |
UNK HIP FEMORAL HEAD METAL |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Degraded (1153)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Pain (1994)
|
| Date of Event |
11/29/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # = > (b)(4) d4: the device catalog number is unknown; therefore, udi is unavailable.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on feb 21, 2008, the patient underwent the primary surgery via tha with the implants monm, g2 stem and pinnacle cup.The date is unknown, but the patient underwent revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023, after suffering a femur fracture and associated pain.The metal liner, metal head, and g2 stem were removed and replaced.Pinnacle cup was left on the body.Armd was suspected because black deposits were found on the trunnion of the removed stem and inside the head.There was a request for verification of the removed products.No further information is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information that has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint#: (b)(4).Investigation summary: according to the information received, ¿it was reported that on (b)(6) 2008, the patient underwent the primary surgery via tha with the implants monm, g2 stem and pinnacle cup.The date is unknown, but the patient underwent revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023, after suffering a femur fracture and associated pain.The metal liner, metal head, and g2 stem were removed and replaced with a marathon liner and a stem (made by another company).Pinnacle cup was left on the body.Armd was suspected because black deposits were found on the trunnion of the removed stem and inside the head.There was a request for verification of the removed products.No further information is available.¿ the product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device and forwarded to the analytical laboratory analysis for further investigation.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that inside the taper area of the articuleze m 28mm 1.5 a yellowish - dark brown material was observed.No signs of a device non conformance nor defects were observed on the outer surface of the femoral head.A non-destructive testing performed by the analytical laboratory analysis revealed the following results: fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ftir) analysis determine that the unknown material was primarily composed of organic biologic material.Kastle meyer test rule out the blood presence due negative reaction for blood components.However, the reaction with hydrogen peroxide confirmed the presence of tissue.Therefore, based on the results obtained, the presence of corrosion-deterioration of the material cannot be confirmed.A dimensional inspection and functional testing were not performed as it is not applicable to the complaint condition.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device [136511500 / 2334554] number, and no non-conformance's / manufacturing irregularities related to the malfunction were identified during manufacturing.The overall complaint was not confirmed as the observed condition of the articuleze m 28mm 1.5 would not contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device [136511500 / 2334554] number, and no non-conformance's / manufacturing irregularities related to the malfunction were identified during manufacturing.Corrected: d4 (primary udi #).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|