|
The following device was also listed in this report: device; unknown -unknown_cork_product ; cat# unk_shc ; lot# unknown.Device; tri ts baseplate size 6 ; cat# 5521-b-600 ; lot# hxl3ba.Device; tri cemented stem 12mmx50mm ; cat# 5560-s-112 ; lot# 0090270e.Device; triathlon ps fem component cemented ; cat# 5515-f-502 ; lot# hra9gd.Device; triathlon asymmetric x3 patella ; cat# 5551-g-381-e ; lot# 34a6.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.Reported event: an event regarding instability involving a triathlon insert was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device remains implanted.-clinician review: a review of medical records with a clinical consultant indicated "conclusion/assessment: the patient underwent a total knee arthroplasty for arthritis with the mako.Preoperative evaluation and medical history were not provided.The procedure seemed uncomplicated.It is not explained why a stemmed component was used on the tibia.The patient's initial postoperative recovery seemed unimpressive.She began having pain.Locking and instability were complaints.This persisted.Despite having increased inflammatory markers the physician did not feel that there were signs of infection as based on a conversation with infectious disease.Ct and mri were noncontributory.Additional lab tests continue to show elevated inflammatory markers.No additional information or plan of care was provided for evaluation.No radiographs were provided for evaluation.Event confirmation: the event, patient pain, can be confirmed from the office notes.Root cause: the root cause cannot be determined without additional medical information, radiographs and evaluation.But infection would need to be ruled out and has a high likelihood of association." -product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: a review of medical records with a clinical consultant indicated "conclusion/assessment: the patient underwent a total knee arthroplasty for arthritis with the mako.Preoperative evaluation and medical history were not provided.The procedure seemed uncomplicated.It is not explained why a stemmed component was used on the tibia.The patient's initial postoperative recovery seemed unimpressive.She began having pain.Locking and instability were complaints.This persisted.Despite having increased inflammatory markers the physician did not feel that there were signs of infection as based on a conversation with infectious disease.Ct and mri were noncontributory.Additional lab tests continue to show elevated inflammatory markers.No additional information or plan of care was provided for evaluation.No radiographs were provided for evaluation.Event confirmation: the event, patient pain, can be confirmed from the office notes.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as return of the device, pathology reports, pre- and post-operative x-rays and the operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|