• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. CONQUEST; PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. CONQUEST; PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CQ5064
Medical Device Problem Code Material Rupture (1546)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/20/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the pta balloon was allegedly ruptured at 10 atm.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, photos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 03/2026).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.Three photos received and reviewed.The first photo shows that balloon in deflated condition.Second photo shows the label of device in which product details could be verified with the reported details.Third photo shows the same as the first photo balloon appeared in deflated condition.No significant evidence of balloon rupture could be observed in the submitted photos.And no other anomalies noted.Based on the submitted photos no significant evidence of balloon rupture could be observed.Hence the investigation for the reported balloon rupture remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause for the reported balloon rupture issue could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiry date: 03/2026), g3, h6 (method) h11: h6 (result, conclusion) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the pta balloon was allegedly ruptured at 10 atm.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the pta balloon was allegedly ruptured at 10 atm.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.Three photos received and reviewed.The first photo shows that balloon in deflated condition.Second photo shows the label of device in which product details could be verified with the reported details.Third photo shows the same as the first photo balloon appeared in deflated condition.No significant evidence of balloon rupture could be observed in the submitted photos.And no other anomalies noted.Based on the submitted photos no significant evidence of balloon rupture could be observed.Hence the investigation for the reported balloon rupture remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause for the reported balloon rupture issue could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONQUEST
Common Device Name
PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key18301088
Report Number2020394-2023-01237
Device Sequence Number14259174
Product Code DQY
UDI-Device Identifier00801741062872
UDI-Public(01)00801741062872(11)230624(17)260331(10)REHS0040
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K083657
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/20/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/31/2026
Device Catalogue NumberCQ5064
Device Lot NumberREHS0040
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/20/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/18/2024
06/13/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/11/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/22/2024
06/24/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured06/24/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-