| Model Number |
TFNT40 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Opacification (1426)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A sample device was not returned for analysis.Complaint history and product history records were reviewed and documentation indicated the product met release criteria.Root cause has not been identified.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A facility representative reported that after an intraocular lens (iol) implantation surgery, noticed lens opacification.Surgeon plans to explant the right eye lens.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information was requested and received that the iol was exchanged for another lens model six months following the initial implant procedure.No patient harm was reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product was not returned.Photos were available and reviewed by company representative.The photographs below demonstrate the following significant findings: 1.This photograph is of and iol through a moderately dilated pupil.There is a dense opacification at approximately 1:30 that starts near the periphery of the lens and extends to within 1 mm of the optical center of the lens.The opacity is approximately 2 mm wide.Additionally, there are random fibrous strands that appear to be anterior to the dense opacification.2.This a photograph of what appears to be the same iol as above.The lighting is different, therefore it is much more apparent that the fibrous strands are anterior to the lens and the dense opacification is either within the lens or on the posterior of the lens.3.This photograph is similar to the first image but focused more on the dense opacification.4.This photograph is almost identical to photo 1.5.This photograph is very similar to photo 1.In this photo the lighting is such that the posterior lens capsule is visible and appears behind (posterior) to the opacification which now appears within the lens.Information was provided that a qualified cartridge was used with a non-qualified viscoelastic and a non-qualified handpiece.The product investigation could not identify a root cause for the reported complaint.The explanted lens was not returned.Based on the photo review conducted by company representative, these photographs appear to show an opacification within the intraocular lens.Determining depth within a photograph is difficult.It requires accurate lighting and the ability to identify structures within the eye that are more anterior or posterior to each other.In this case the series of photos seems to support the opacification is within the lens.It is difficult to make a final determination without evaluation of the physical sample.The root cause cannot be determined based on available information.Each lens is subjected to a 100% assessment of the power and optical resolution during the manufacturing process in order to determine acceptability per the lens model and diopter.A failure to follow the ifu( instructions for use) also occurred with the use of a non-qualified viscoelastic and non-qualified handpiece.The ifu instructs: company foldable iol( intraocular lens) are qualified for use with an company qualified delivery system (handpiece and cartridge) and ophthalmic viscosurgical device (ovd) combination.The ifu instructs that an company qualified delivery system and viscoelastic combination should be used.The use of an unqualified combination may cause damage to the lens and potential complications during the implantation process.Per the company device ifu: qualified cartridge/iol combinations have been validated at an ambient temperature of 18 °c using the driving console setting (1.7 mm/sec, 3 seconds, and 3.0 mm/sec for initial velocity, pause and final velocity respectively).Using a higher velocity and shorter pause at lower temperatures, especially with high diopter lenses, could induce damage to iol and/or iol cartridge, affecting successful iol implantation.The company (2.25 cyl.) 18.0 diopter (add power +2.2/+3.2 diopter) was removed and replaced with a company (2.25 cyl.) 18.5 diopter (1.5 extended depth of focus) lens.This information may also suggest that the replacement lens model and diopter was an improved selection for this patient's vision needs.Multiple follow ups were conducted for more information.Based on the questionnaire response the explanted lens was available for return; however the lens has not returned.If the sample or additional information becomes available, the file will reopened and updated.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|