• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. UNK LINX MAGNETIC IMPLANT; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. UNK LINX MAGNETIC IMPLANT; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK LINX MAGNETIC IMPLANT
Medical Device Problem Code Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 01/01/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
The device was received without event details.No patient consequence reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent:12/13/2023.B3: only event year known: 2023.No lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: on what date did the implant take place? on what date did the explant take place? lot #? does the patient have any of the allergies to metals? if so, what test have been done to test for metal allergies.Is the patient currently taking currently taking steroids / immunosuppressive drugs? did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? was mesh used at time of implant? what was the reason for removal of the linx device? at the time of removal, was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? have the symptoms resolved since the device was explanted? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 1/2/2024.Additional information received: the product code is a ls13.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: on what date did the implant take place? on what date did the explant take place? lot #? does the patient have any of the allergies to metals? if so, what test have been done to test for metal allergies.Is the patient currently taking currently taking steroids / immunosuppressive drugs? did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? was mesh used at time of implant? what was the reason for removal of the linx device? at the time of removal, was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? have the symptoms resolved since the device was explanted? no more additional information available.D1, d4.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) date sent: 1/31/2024 could not be 100% sure that the device was a ls13 d1, d4.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 2/13/2024.Additional information received: spoke to (b)(6), he stated that he gave the return box to dr.(b)(6) for file (b)(4) a very long time ago.As far as he knew dr.(b)(6) only had 1 device to be returned.Tillman smith has no idea where the other 6 devices came from or how they were sent back under (b)(4).From hcp: all have been explants i performed.Send all my explants back to j&j so they can evaluate the device.They all have a patient name, dob, and mrn on the containers containing the devices.Happy to provide any details if you send me names, dob and mrns.From cg labs: g labs do not have additional information; they sent me the image of the fedex label where they received all the unidentified torax devices.The devices arrived under the (b)(4).Received (2) lxmc17, (2) lxmc16, (2) lxmc14 and (1) lxmc13.A total of 7 blind complaints were created for the returned unidentified devices.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Investigation summary: overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that was returned for analysis.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, and significant tooling marks were noted in some beads.Link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, the device was found to be conforming.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK LINX MAGNETIC IMPLANT
Common Device Name
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4545 creek road
cincinnati OH
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
4545 creek rd.
cincinnati, OH 45242
3035526892
MDR Report Key18318207
Report Number3008766073-2023-00247
Device Sequence Number6115115
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005028
UDI-Public00855106005028
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P100049
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/26/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK LINX MAGNETIC IMPLANT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/04/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/14/2023
01/06/2024
01/31/2024
03/25/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/13/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/02/2024
01/31/2024
02/13/2024
03/26/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
Yes
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-