MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 3DMAX; SURGICAL MESH

Catalog Number	0115320
Medical Device Problem Codes	Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Defective Device (2588); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes	Adhesion(s) (1695); Nerve Damage (1979); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event	10/11/2019
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol 3dmax mesh on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the 3dmax mesh.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol 3dmax mesh on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the 3dmax mesh.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2015 ¿ patient was diagnosed with bilateral inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of two 3dmax meshes (device 1 and 2).Per operative notes, ¿in right side, the indirect hernia with sac was dissected.A medium sized 3dmax mesh (device 1) was placed and tacked.In the left side, the indirect hernia sac was dissected and another 3dmax mesh (device 2) was placed around the cord structures sutured and tacked.¿ (b)(6) 2019 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent right inguinal hernia and pain thereby underwent open repair with implant of bard flat mesh (device 3).Per operative notes, ¿an incarcerated recurrent inguinal hernia with mesh (device 1) protruding through indirect space and densely adhered to the ilioinguinal nerve was noted.The ilioinguinal nerve was dissected off and recurrent hernia was reduced and bard flat mesh (device 3) was placed and secured with sutures.¿.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jun-2015) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.

• Brand Name: 3DMAX
• Common Device Name: SURGICAL MESH
• Manufacturer (Section D): DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643; 100 crossings blvd.; warwick RI 02886
• Manufacturer (Section G): BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544; san geronimo industrial park; lot #1, road #3, km 79.7; humacao PR 00791
• Manufacturer Contact: andrew topoulos ; 100 crossings blvd.; warwick, RI 02886 ; 4018258495
• MDR Report Key: 18333390
• Report Number: 1213643-2023-095217
• Device Sequence Number: 18249006
• Product Code: FTL
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00801741030758
• UDI-Public: (01)00801741030758(17)200528(10)HUZF0655
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: TX
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: K081010
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2015
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Other,Consumer
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Non-Healthcare Professional
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 11/11/2025

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 05/28/2020
• Device Catalogue Number: 0115320
• Device Lot Number: HUZF0655
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Type of Report(Section G): Initial
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 12/13/2023
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 10/21/2025
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 12/15/2023
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 11/11/2025
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
• Date Device Manufactured: 06/15/2015
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Required Intervention; Disability
• Patient Age: 66 YR
• Patient Sex: Male