|
SYNTHES GMBH LARGE QUICK COUPLING FOR TRS; INSTRUMENT, SURGICAL, ORTHOPEDIC, AC-POWERED, MOTOR/ACCESS AND ATTACHMENT
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
05.001.213 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available (3191); Premature Separation (4045)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/07/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: as of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.D4: udi: (b)(4).D4: the date of manufacture was unknown.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported from japan that during an open reduction and internal fixation (orif) surgery for femoral intertrochanteric fracture on proximal femur, it was observed that the quick coupling device and reamer tip could not be connected and would spin out if torque was applied.There was a ten minute delay in the surgical procedure.A spare device was used to complete the procedure.There was patient involvement.There were no injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: the actual device was returned for evaluation.During repair, an evaluation was performed and it was determined that the device connection pins on the handpiece coupling side were too far out and the test gauge could not slide over them.Furthermore, it was found that the two pins on the coupling shaft were missing.Due to the broken off pins the attachment was unable to transfer the rotary motion to the drill bit.The device failed pretests for check pins length of handpiece coupling and check for run-out inspection in running mode.The reported condition of the devices unexpected disengagement was not confirmed.The assignable root cause was traced to component failure due to normal wear.A device history review was performed, and no non-conformances were detected related to the reported condition.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|