|
The manufacturer was contacted in reference to the voluntary field safety notice / recall notification related to the sound abatement foam in certain cpap, bipap, and mechanical ventilator devices.The manufacturer received information alleging damage to lungs, melanoma, irritable cough and fear of secondary diseases.Medical intervention was not specified.The device has not yet been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.At this time, no further investigation can be performed.If any additional information is received, a follow up report will be filed.
|
|
The manufacturer was previously contacted in reference to the voluntary field safety notice / recall notification related to the sound abatement foam in certain cpap, bipap, and mechanical ventilator devices.The manufacturer received information alleging damage to lungs, melanoma, irritable cough and fear of secondary diseases.Medical intervention was not specified.The updated describe event or problem will be: the dreamstation auto cpap was returned to the third party service center for evaluation, and the customer¿s complaint was not confirmed.During the evaluation it was noted that the foam particles were not observed.Additionally, the device was corrected.At this time, no further investigation can be performed.If any additional information is received, a follow up report will be filed.In box d: product udi, device serviced by 3rdp?, device available for eval?, device available for eval?, date returned to mfg are updated in this follow-up.In box g: date received by mfg is updated in this follow-up.In box h: evaluation method code grid, evaluation results code grid, component code grid, conclusion code grid are updated in this follow-up.
|