|
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SÃ RL PERMALOOP STRAIGHT NEEDLE 1PK; SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
280937 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/12/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: e3: reporter is a j&j sales representative.H4: the device manufacture date is currently unavailable.As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.Udi: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the sales rep in japan that during an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (aclr) procedure on (b)(6) 2023, it was observed that the surgeon cut the distal end of the loop with a pointed blade and passed the permaloop suture blue braided tape loop straight 31mm taper 1.3mm 20" (51cm) device into the joint with the state that it had 2 suture ends.At that time, the distal permaloop snapped.When passing sutures into the joint, some tension is applied from the tibia side, but the surgeon said that they did not apply any excessive force than normal.There was enough length left to use the fixation device ¿dsp¿ on the tibia side, so there was no problem with subsequent procedures.This was a aclr by 2 routes, and another permaloop with the same product code was used for the other route.It was able to be used normally/successfully.The device was brand new and the first use when the issue occurred.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H4: the device manufacture date was unavailable in the initial medwatch report.The date been updated accordingly.Investigation summary: the complaint device is not being returned, it was discarded by the customer, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.Since the complaint device was discarded, we cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.If additional information is received in the future, we will reopen the complaint and perform the investigation as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number (220l980), and no non-conformances were identified.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|