• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. AZUR CX 35 DETACHABLE; PERIPHERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. AZUR CX 35 DETACHABLE; PERIPHERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 45-750617
Medical Device Problem Code Premature Separation (4045)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/12/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
A search for non-conformances associated with the reported part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was not returned to the manufacturer for analysis; therefore, the alleged product issue cannot be confirmed.If the device or additional information is received, microvention, inc., will submit a supplemental mdr report.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies premature or difficult coil detachment as potential complications associated with use of the device.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the azur coil detached prematurely without using the controller.The coil and delivery system were removed together without incident.No patient harm was reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation of the returned coil system found the pusher heater coil damaged, and the implant stretched at the proximal section and separated from the pusher; however, no indications of activation using a detachment controller was found on the pusher heater coil.The investigation found the pusher's monofilament with a tensile break shape at the tip, which is consistent with the device experiencing excessive force that exceeded the strength of the monofilament causing the implant to separate from the pusher.The physical evaluation of the device could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the damage, but the damage is consistent with the device experiencing forces over specification.The microcatheter used in the procedure was not returned for evaluation, so the investigation could not determine if it had caused or contributed to the reported complaint.
 
Event or Problem Description
See h10.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AZUR CX 35 DETACHABLE
Common Device Name
PERIPHERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key18380550
Report Number2032493-2023-01141
Device Sequence Number7713318
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00812636021041
UDI-Public(01)00812636021041(11)200210(17)250131(10)2002105K2
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K162524
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/26/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2025
Device Model Number45-750617
Device Lot Number2002105K2
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/08/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/08/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/21/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/26/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-