| Model Number |
HIP-IMPLANT |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Naturally Worn (2988); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Joint Dislocation (2374); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
12/04/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information, including the product investigation, will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported, patient had a revision for an unknown reason.Patient was revised to a cc inlay vitamin e, lippe, ø 32, gr.2 (cat# 142-32-62 / serial# (b)(6)).No further information at this time.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H2: there is no specific device information provided.The cause of the patient's condition and revision surgery as related to the devices cannot be conclusively determined, insufficient information/reason not reported.These devices are used for treatment not diagnosis.Correction: h6.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this patient was revised due to repeated dislocations subsequently to premature inlay wear captured in report number 1038671-2023-02272.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay corrected information.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay corrected information.H3 - the cause of the patient¿s dislocation and subsequent revision reported cannot be conclusively determined; however, it may be due to soft tissue tension, implant positioning, and/or implant selection.However, the failure could not be confirmed because the devices were not returned for evaluation, and relevant patient information, images, or radiographs were not provided.Dislocation is a known risk, as outlined in the ifu.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.The following sections were updated/corrected: d4, h4, h6.Mdr section codes updated/corrected: b.The cause of the patient¿s dislocation and subsequent revision reported in cannot be conclusively determined; however, it may be due to soft tissue tension, implant positioning, and/or implant selection.However, the failure could not be confirmed because the devices were not returned for evaluation, and relevant patient information, images, or radiographs were not provided.Dislocation is a known risk, as outlined in the ifu.Should additional relevant information be obtained, a follow-up mdr will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|