|
|
| Catalog Number |
5959480 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Material Deformation (2976); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
06/08/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol sepramesh composite ip on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the sepramesh composite ip.Attorney alleges that the patient had revision surgeries on (b)(6) 2022.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-aug-2014) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol sepramesh composite ip on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the sepramesh composite ip.Attorney alleges that the patient had revision surgeries on (b)(6) 2022.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2015 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent incarcerated umbilical hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of sepramesh ip.Per op notes, ¿the mesh was incorporated on left lateral side but not on right.A piece of sepramesh ip was placed into defect and sutured.¿ (note: the mesh seen during this procedure was unknown) (b)(6) 2022 ¿ patient had pain and was diagnosed with recurrent umbilical hernia thereby underwent open repair with the removal of meshes.Per op notes, ¿the sac herniated within the old mesh.The mesh was herniated into meshoma an second mesh was intact.All the meshes were removed.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|