|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: - did the needle broke or pull-off from the suture? pulled-off from the needle.- what is the total number of products involved in each procedure? one.- did the event occur during one or multiple patient procedures? multiple.- what is the total number of procedures? five.Investigation summary: the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional test evaluation were conducted on the returned device.The returned sample determined that one strand double-armed in two sections that pertain to the product code eph8725h was received.During the visual inspection of the returned sample, the swage and attachment area was noted as expected.The suture pieces were examined, and ends were noted to be cut probably caused by a surgical instrument.The functional test was performed using instron equipment and the pull force result was above the minimum requirements.As part of the ethicon quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|