• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: HOYA SURGICAL OPTICS, INC. 250; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

HOYA SURGICAL OPTICS, INC. 250; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number 250 (+ 24 D)
Medical Device Problem Code Crack (1135)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/21/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This initial report is being submitted to fda for a reportable event that occurred outside the usa.Cracked or broken optic is indicated as a potential malfunction related to the iol, as covered under the warnings section of the product's instructions for use (ifu).Regarding section h6 - manufacturer's codes for: type of investigation, findings, and conclusion are pending device return and completion of product investigation.Once the product investigation is completed, a follow-up report will be submitted to fda which will include the manufacturer's codes for type of investigation, findings, and conclusion.
 
Event or Problem Description
Damaged optic after implantation/post-operative complications.The implanted iol had a scratch and the patient complained unusual for their vision after the operation.The doctor did not noice the scratch of the iol during the operation, but after the surgery the doctor confirmed the scratch on the iol.The iol was explanted from the patient eye.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report # 1 emdr is being submitted to fda for a reportable event that occurred outside the usa.The report includes corrected and additional information not available/included in the initial report.Corrected information: corrected to yes additional information: type of report - noted as follow-up #1 type of follow-up - noted for correction and additional information added codes for manufacturer's investigation: type; findings; and conclusion.The product was returned to the manufacturer.The investigation was conducted, with the methods and results as noted below.Appearance check result was consistent to reported information.No abnormalities were found in production and inspection records of the product.Serial no.: (b)(6); model: 255 the exact root cause was not determined.However, based on the available information and our investigation, we believe this event was not caused by our product quality.A review of the most recent complaint trending data indicates that no significant trends have been identified at this time and no capa is required as part of the product evaluation.
 
Event or Problem Description
Damaged optic after implantation/post-operative complications.The implanted iol had a scratch and the patient complained unusual for their vision after the operation.The doctor did not noice the scratch of the iol during the operation, but after the surgery the doctor confirmed the scratch on the iol.The iol was explanted from the patient eye.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
250
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
HOYA SURGICAL OPTICS, INC.
110 progress
suite 175
irvine
Manufacturer (Section G)
HOYA CORPORATION
6-10-1 nishi shinjuku
shinjuku-ku
tokyo, 160-0 023
JA   160-0023
Manufacturer Contact
goutham pendyala
110 progress
suite175
irvine, CA 92618
9093896317
MDR Report Key18412544
Report Number3006723646-2023-00462
Device Sequence Number18280099
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier04547480480862
UDI-Public04547480480862
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
P080004
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/20/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2026
Device Model Number250 (+ 24 D)
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/01/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/01/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/28/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/20/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/30/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-