| Model Number |
DIB00 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Mechanical Problem (1384); Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/13/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section a2, a4, a5: information unknown/not provided.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as the lens was not implanted.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as the lens was not implanted; therefore, it was not explanted.Section e1: telephone number: (b)(6).Section h3-other (81): the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Section h6: medical device problem code: 1069 lens damage, 1069 cartridge damage.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information.However, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a preloaded monofocal intraocular lens (iol) plunger started to override the lens and would no longer push the lens forward.The plunger then exited the end of the cartridge with the lens still partially stuck inside the cartridge.The side of the cartridge has been damaged by the plunger.And the lens was defective to some degree.There was patient contact as the cartridge tip contacted the eye.An incision enlargement, suture, or vitrectomy was not required.There was no need for any further patient intervention.The patient was discharged home without any issue and has fully recovered.Through follow up it was learned that the tip of the cartridge was not damaged.There was however a long outward protrusion alongside the cartridge as if the plunger had scraped the cartridge as it was being moved.It was reported the cartridge was lubricated with a competitor balance salt solution (bss) with added additives.0.5 millimeter (ml) of epinephrine was added to the bss bag (500 ml).This solution is used to prime the cartridge with.The lens is not available as it was lost in the commotion during the surgery, however, the inserter with cartridge is available for return.No further information to provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional info: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 02/05/2024.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer¿ yes.Device evaluation: the complaint simplicity delivery system was received inside a plastic bag.No lens was received for evaluation.Visual inspection of the complaint simplicity revealed that the plunger rod was partially advanced.No damage was observed with the cartridge, lens module, handpiece, or plunger rod.Ovd (ophthalmic viscosurgical device) was observed inside the cartridge indicating that an inadequate amount of ovd was used.No ovd was observed inside the lens module.No issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issue were observed.No lens was received for evaluation.The complaint issues were not identified during product evaluation.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be confirmed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrected data : in follow up number one, investigation results were provided for the backup simplicity device (serial number (b)(6)) used and not the initial simplicity device (sn (b)(6).Therefore, this correction follow up report is being submitted to provide the correct investigation results for serial number (b)(6).Through follow up the customer confirmed serial number (b)(6) was stuck in cartridge and serial number (b)(6) was implanted.The following sections have been updated accordingly: section h6: type of investigation: 10- testing of actual/suspected device.The code 4116 provided in the previous mdr is no longer applicable.Section h6: investigation findings: 114- operational problem identified.The code 213 provided in the previous mdr is no longer applicable.Section h6: investigation conclusions: 4315- cause not established.The code 67 provided in the previous mdr is no longer applicable.Device evaluation: the simplicity device was visually inspected under magnification and revealed that the cartridge had stress marks, however, these stress marks were within specification for used product.The cartridge tip was also observed to be deformed.Ovd was observed inside the cartridge, the lens module was opened and inspected and no ovd was present inside the lens module.The lens was observed to be stuck in the cartridge and overridden by the plunger rod.The lens was removed from the cartridge, cleaned, and inspected and lens damage was observed on the edge of the lens, and one haptic was detached and missing.No further issues were observed.The complaint issue "override", "lens damaged", and "stuck in cartridge" were identified during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.The complaint issue "cartridge damaged" was not identified during product evaluation.The observed "cartridge tip cracked/damaged" is similar to the reported complaint issue.However, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be confirmed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|