• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: UNKNOWN ROTAREX; THROMBECTOMY & ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

UNKNOWN ROTAREX; THROMBECTOMY & ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 80201
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/21/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the moderately calcified lesion via the crossover approach, the helix was allegedly broken.It was further reported that the helix was allegedly found to be detached.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex products are identified in d2 and g4.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the moderately calcified lesion via the crossover approach, the helix was allegedly broken.It was further reported that the helix was allegedly found to be detached.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the moderately calcified lesion via the crossover approach, the helix was allegedly broken.It was further reported that the helix was allegedly found to be detached.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the catheter was returned for evaluation.Therefore, a physical investigation was performed for the catheter.The set lot number was not provided in the report and it was not able to identified during investigation.During physical investigation, the helix was broken at 20 cm distance from the tip of the catheter.The broken helix part was outside of the catheter in the introducer sheath.There was also a part of the snare stuck in the introducer sheath.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported helix break issue.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTAREX
Common Device Name
THROMBECTOMY & ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
UNKNOWN
BR 
Manufacturer (Section G)
UNKNOWN
BR  
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key18417744
Report Number3008439199-2023-00228
Device Sequence Number17844372
Product Code MCW
UDI-Device Identifier07640142810292
UDI-Public(01)07640142810292
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K211738
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/19/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number80201
Device Lot Number230991
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/11/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/18/2023
02/19/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/29/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/12/2024
03/05/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age63 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-