|
(b)(4).Multiple mdr reports were filed for this event, please see associated reports: 3009185973 - 2023 - 00017.Log files were provided and reviewed by a subject matter expert (sme).No permanent electrodes were left implanted; therefore, the reported inaccuracy could not be verified through the logs alone.However, the registration and verification process were still analyzed.The registration analysis shows that registration was performed with markers positioned on the leksell frame pins instead of actual compatible bone fiducials.This registration method is an off-label use.Per section 2.4.1.2 bone fiducials registration: "this method requires the use of bone fiducials which are implanted into the patient¿s skull.Refer to the list of compatible devices for the available compatibility with bone fiducials models." additionally, review of the registration verification indicates that the points were either validated with important errors detected or skipped entirely.While the user was most likely unable to reach anatomical points due to the presence of the frame, section 2.4.2 accuracy verification procedure of the user brain manual states: ¿the user must position the pointer probe or the optical distance sensor on several relevant anatomic landmarks of the patient¿s head and verify the appropriate matching of the navigated position on the preoperative images.¿ ¿it is highly recommended to carry out the verification in order to obtain optimal performance.¿ since the recommendations for registration and verification were not followed there is no guarantee that the registration is accurate regarding the patient¿s head.No errors were found in the logs that would indicate that the rosa software caused or contributed to the inaccuracy.The reported issue was confirmed by a field service engineer (fse) who was present to assist the procedure.The leksell frame moved during registration and during the procedure, which affected the accuracy of the electrode placement.While the effects of the first shift were corrected by importing a new reference exam and reattempting registration, the effects of the second shift were not detected until the electrodes were placed for awake testing.The system successfully passed all tests during the next preventative maintenance visit.Device history records were reviewed and no discrepancies related to the reported event were found.During the investigation, the reported inaccuracy was confirmed.A shift in the leksell frame adaptor was identified by the fse and user error with the registration and verification process were identified in the log analysis.However, it cannot be determined which issue, or the extent, that caused or contributed to the inaccuracy.Therefore, the definitive root cause was unable to be determined.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|