• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR SILTEX ROUND MODERATE PROFILE; PROSTHESIS, BREAST, INFLATABLE, INTERNAL, SALINE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR SILTEX ROUND MODERATE PROFILE; PROSTHESIS, BREAST, INFLATABLE, INTERNAL, SALINE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 3542670
Medical Device Problem Code Material Rupture (1546)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
Date of Event 01/01/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a patient who underwent primary breast augmentation with a mentor siltex round moderate profile 425cc saline prosthesis experienced right sided deflation post procedure.As a result, explant was performed on (b)(6) 2024.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: deflation.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received on january 12, 2024.The explant date was clarified to be (b)(6) 2024.Replacement is planned with explant.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The impacted product was received by the failure analysis lab on (b)(6) 2024.The investigation of the returned device was completed by the failure analysis lab on (b)(6) 2024.Device evaluation summary: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted visual inspection, leak testing, and microscopic examination of the returned device.During visual evaluation no apparent damage or visual anomalies were observed on the returned device.Leak testing was performed, according with mentor procedures, and it revealed a tear (tear a) on the anterior view, and two tears on the posterior view (tears b and c), within areas of siltex cracking, measuring 0.1 cm, 0.3 cm, and 0.8 cm, respectively.Microscopic examination was performed, and the cause of tear a could not be identified.Although no conclusion could be reach on the cause of tear a, the instructions for use contain the following caution: causes of deflation of saline implants include but are not limited to the following events: crease fold failure, intraoperative or postoperative trauma, excessive stresses or manipulations as may occur during normal, daily routines including customary and purposeful trauma such as that which can occur during vigorous exercise, athletics, etc.The evaluation determined that the possible cause of the deflation on tear b and c is consistent with normal wear.Siltex cracking is defined as a material separation occurring in the siltex layer and can eventually progress through the shell of siltex devices.Siltex cracking is ultimately a result of high stresses.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MENTOR SILTEX ROUND MODERATE PROFILE
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, BREAST, INFLATABLE, INTERNAL, SALINE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MENTOR TEXAS
3041 skyway circle north
irving TX 75038
Manufacturer (Section G)
MENTOR TEXAS
3041 skyway circle north
irving TX 75038
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
3041 skyway circle north
irving, TX 75038
3035526892
MDR Report Key18431464
Report Number1645337-2024-00035
Device Sequence Number20861666
Product Code FWM
UDI-Device Identifier00081317001829
UDI-Public00081317001829
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P990075
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2005
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/14/2008
Device Catalogue Number3542670
Device Lot Number5569486
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/08/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/12/2024
03/01/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/02/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/16/2024
03/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/15/2004
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age43 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-