• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Scratched Material (3020)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Hyphema (1911); Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss (4806)
Date of Event 12/12/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same surgery.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same surgery.Section h3-other (81): the device was not returned for evaluation as it was discarded; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a preloaded monofocal intraocular lens (iol) had a large gouge near the center of the optic and the doctor had to do an iol exchange which resulted in a hyphema and likely endothelial damage.The customer had already disposed of both, the lens and the injector.No other information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: the customer provided photo was evaluated by a post market safety surveillance officer.The pictures show a pseudophakic eye, claimed to be implanted with a tecnis eyhance iol with simplicity delivery system, model dib00.It can be observed a mark (crack like) located at the lens mid periphery with a triangular shape.The root cause of the reported event or its potential clinical impact cannot be determined from a picture assessment.The complaint issue "dc-cosmetic issues" was identified during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation the complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key18441446
Report Number3012236936-2024-00024
Device Sequence Number7847132
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731684
UDI-Public(01)05050474731684(17)260619
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateLA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/05/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/19/2026
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0165
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/12/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/29/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/03/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/05/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/19/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-