| Catalog Number |
7208678 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Flaked (1246); Fracture (1260); Material Deformation (2976)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/16/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during an arthroscopy, a pin passing drill tip ate the pin with eyelet after it was passed.When a guide was passed in the tibia, it was seen that the guide was releasing metal, even though the only thing it was passing through was bone and it had no contact with any hard surface.The procedure was successfully completed with a surgical delay of less than 30 minutes using a competitor device.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference case- (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6: the shipping information was provided; however, the subject device was not made available to the designated complaint unit and thus a physical product evaluation could not be performed.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The root cause of the reported event could not be determined since the device was not received for evaluation.Please refer to the instructions for use for precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is received at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection of the returned devices found that they are not in their original packaging.The devices for both the -1 and -2 complaint were in one box and indistinguishable from one another.Device 1 was returned fractured with the metal deformed, twisted and bent.Device 2 was returned with a portion of the shaft has been scraped up and has a flap of metal and biological debris on the shaft.There is biological debris on the returned items.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The root cause has been associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include an application of unintended inappropriate or excessive force to the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, or an impact event inconsistent with normal use.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.H11: h2: corrected data on: h6 (impact code).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|