• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. LGN PS HIGH FLEX XLPE SZ 7-8 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. LGN PS HIGH FLEX XLPE SZ 7-8 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 71453231
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Subluxation (4525)
Date of Event 12/15/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after tka surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2016, the patient presented to surgeon with subluxation in knee.It was determined by the surgeon that the post of the lgn ps high flex xlpe sz 7-8 9mm that was originally implanted had broken.A knee revision was performed on (b)(6) 2023 to replace the poly to a constrained version.Patient's current health status is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: internal complaint reference (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: the associated device was returned and evaluated.The visual inspection revealed the post fractured off the device.The post was returned.The visual also reveals discoloration, scratches and deep gouges in the device.The knee insert post deformation and/or fracture may have been due to repeated posterior contact of the femoral cam on the post combined with excessive posterior to anterior shear force during activity.However, this could not be isolated as the root cause for this particular failure mode.Some additional factors that could have contributed to the reported event include patient anatomy, abnormal loading of limb and/or traumatic injury.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, per complaint details, an insert revision (exchange for a constrained version) was performed 7 years post-total knee arthroplasty due to subluxation in the knee and it was determined by the surgeon that the insert-post had broken.It was communicated that the requested clinical documentation was not available.Based on the limited information provided, definitive contributing clinical factors cannot be concluded.The instructions for use in possible adverse events does address subluxation, unusual stress concentrations, etc.And does note that the implant can fracture/ may require future revision and contributing factors may include strenuous activity, duration of service, and muscle and fibrous tissue laxity among other possible factors.The current patient status is unknown.Patient impact beyond the reported revision secondary to subluxation and broken insert post cannot be determined.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history revealed similar events for the listed device over the previous 12 months, but no similar events for the batch based on the historical data, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.According per material specification, the quality and manufacture of polyethylene bar shall be controlled.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LGN PS HIGH FLEX XLPE SZ 7-8 9MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key18466050
Report Number1020279-2024-00050
Device Sequence Number15220377
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier00885556034620
UDI-Public00885556034620
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K071071
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/09/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/30/2025
Device Catalogue Number71453231
Device Lot Number15GT57354
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/05/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/08/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/08/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/09/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/30/2015
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-