• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number PCB00
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/30/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a4 and a5: unknown/ not provided.Patient information cannot be provided due to personal data privacy legislation/policy.Section d6a: implant date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section d6b: explant date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section e1: email address: unknown/not provided.Section e1: initial reporter telephone number: (b)(6).Section h3-other (81): it was indicated that the device is not returning for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that after intraocular lens (iol) was implanted, there was a crack on the optic.Iol was removed and replaced.No further information available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Date returned to manufacturer: 05 april 2024.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection of the complaint lens revealed that it was received cut into two pieces and the haptic was cut.The lens was removed from the gauze and cleaned, presenting with no issues that would have caused or contributed to the complaint event.The complaint issue was not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key18466116
Report Number3012236936-2024-00060
Device Sequence Number15242472
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474558298
UDI-Public(01)05050474558298(17)260525
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/20/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/25/2026
Device Model NumberPCB00
Device Catalogue NumberPCB0000215
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/12/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/29/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/08/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/20/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/25/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-