• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD PHOENIX¿ AUTOMATED MICROBIOLOGY SYSTEM; SYSTEM, TEST, AUTOMATED ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY, SHORT INCUBATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD PHOENIX¿ AUTOMATED MICROBIOLOGY SYSTEM; SYSTEM, TEST, AUTOMATED ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY, SHORT INCUBATION Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 448100
Medical Device Problem Code Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/11/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during use of the bd phoenix¿ automated microbiology system, there was a sample misidentification.No patient impact was reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
There were multiple pma/510k numbers.The information for each additional pma/510k is as follows: g.5.Pma / 510(k)#: k020322, k020323, k040099, k131331 h.3.A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.H3 other text : na.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H.6.Investigation summary: a failure for mis-identification of results was reported on a phoenix 100 instrument (p/n 448100, s/n (b)(6).The customer reported that missed ids and lamps about to expire.The fse was dispatched for this case.Based from the work order, the fse saved system data, saved syslog, replaced uv lamps, qualifed and tested instrument and the result is ok.The instrument has been returned to customer for use.This is not confirmed failure of bd product.No samples were expected to be received as part of this complaint, and therefore no samples were returned and no returned material investigation could occur.Dhr review is not required for this complaint as this complaint does not allege an early life failure or failure at installation and the configuration has changed since release from manufacturing due to service repairs/pms.Service history review was completed and revealed no further cases related to this failure mode.Quality will continue to monitor the results complaints for phoenix 100 instruments.No new risks or hazards, or changes to existing risks/hazards, were identified as a result of this complaint.H3 other text : see h.10.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during use of the bd phoenix¿ automated microbiology system, there was a sample misidentification.No patient impact was reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD PHOENIX¿ AUTOMATED MICROBIOLOGY SYSTEM
Common Device Name
SYSTEM, TEST, AUTOMATED ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY, SHORT INCUBATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
jo doyka
7 loveton circle
sparks, MD 21152
4103164000
MDR Report Key18478025
Report Number1119779-2023-01491
Device Sequence Number6594048
Product Code LON
UDI-Device Identifier00382904481001
UDI-Public(01)00382904481001
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCA
PMA/510(K) Number
K020321
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/01/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Other
Device Catalogue Number448100
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/11/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/01/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/09/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/24/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/19/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-