• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OBSIDIO, INC. OBSIDIO; VASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OBSIDIO, INC. OBSIDIO; VASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Ischemia (1942); Necrosis (1971); Pain (1994); Urinary Retention (2119); Bowel Perforation (2668); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Date of Event 11/16/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
A2: age at time of event: 18 years or older h6: patient codes: appropriate term / code not available is listed for post embolization syndrome (pes).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that patient complications occurred requiring hospitalization and patient expired.Obsidio was selected for a hemorrhoidal artery embolization of the bilateral superior and middle rectal arteries in all 4 branches.The size of the vessels were less than 2mm.The physician described variable feel of delivering obsidio in each of the arteries using the aliquot technique.The physician reported a total obsidio volume for entire procedure of around 0.25 ml.The physician did not notice any evidence of fragmentation on fluoroscopy.The patient was discharged home post procedure.The patient was readmitted to the hospital due to urinary retention.Leukocytosis was noted which felt secondary to the expected post-embolization syndrome.The patient had no significant rectal pain.A proctoscopy was performed at approximately 3 weeks into the admission.The patient was found to have approximately 25 cm long of circumferential necrosis of rectum consistent with ischemic changes.Pain at this point was improved and the patient was tolerating a full diet.Rescoping was performed 4-5 days later and ischemic changes appeared improved and the patient was discharged home.One week later, the patient was not feeling well and was readmitted to the hospital.A rectal perforation with focal 1 cm defect was noted.The patient underwent a diverting colostomy.The patient was never extubated post operatively and expired 5 weeks post procedure.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that patient complications occurred requiring hospitalization and patient expired.Obsidio was selected for a hemorrhoidal artery embolization of the bilateral superior and middle rectal arteries in all 4 branches.The size of the vessels were less than 2mm.The physician described variable feel of delivering obsidio in each of the arteries using the aliquot technique.The physician reported a total obsidio volume for entire procedure of around 0.25 ml.The physician did not notice any evidence of fragmentation on fluoroscopy.The patient was discharged home post procedure.The patient was readmitted to the hospital due to urinary retention.Leukocytosis was noted which felt secondary to the expected post-embolization syndrome.The patient had no significant rectal pain.A proctoscopy was performed at approximately 3 weeks into the admission.The patient was found to have approximately 25 cm long of circumferential necrosis of rectum consistent with ischemic changes.Pain at this point was improved and the patient was tolerating a full diet.Rescoping was performed 4-5 days later and ischemic changes appeared improved and the patient was discharged home.One week later, the patient was not feeling well and was readmitted to the hospital.A rectal perforation with focal 1 cm defect was noted.The patient underwent a diverting colostomy.The patient was never extubated post operatively and expired 5 weeks post procedure.It was further reported per medical review with the treating physician, that the patient death is assessed as related to patient's underlying medical condition and is not directly related to the obsidio product.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H6: patient codes: appropriate term / code not available is listed for post embolization syndrome (pes).B2: outcomes attrib to adv event: removed death b5: describe event or problem: additional information d4: updated unique identifier (udi) # from (b)(4).H6: impact codes: removed death code.H6: evaluation conclusion codes (1) updated from cmc-no problem detected to unintended use error caused or contributed to event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OBSIDIO
Common Device Name
VASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OBSIDIO, INC.
2 scimed pl
maple grove 55331
Manufacturer (Section G)
OBSIDIO
2 scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer Contact
rachel shields
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
6512422111
MDR Report Key18487080
Report Number2124215-2023-75806
Device Sequence Number3533979
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00191506043124
UDI-Public00191506043124
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNY
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K213385
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/09/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/12/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/16/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/10/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/09/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Hospitalization; Death;
Patient Age85 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-