• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. TRACHEAL INTUBATION FIBERSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. TRACHEAL INTUBATION FIBERSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number LF-GP
Medical Device Problem Code Peeled/Delaminated (1454)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to olympus for evaluation.In addition to reported finding in b5, the device evaluation found that the water tightness was lost due to a cut on the connecting tube, the bending angle in up direction did not meet the standard value due to wear of angle wire, the image was foggy due to damage on the objective lens, and the connecting tube had a dent.The investigation is ongoing.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation or if any additional information is provided by the user facility.
 
Event or Problem Description
A user facility returned the olympus asset, fiberscope to the olympus service center.Upon inspection and testing of the returned device, it was observed that the coating of the connecting tube was peeling.This report is being submitted for the reportable malfunction found during evaluation.There was no patient involvement.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.It has been over 17 years since the subject device was manufactured.The device instructions for use document was reviewed.Review showed the following relevant instruction related to detection of this issue in chapter 3, section 3.2: preparation and inspection of the endoscope: 1.Visually inspect the control section for excessive scratching.2.Visually inspect the boot and the insertion tube near the boot for bends, twists or other irregularities.3.Visually inspect the surface of the insertion tube for dents, bulges, swelling, peeling or other irregularities.4.Carefully run your fingertips over the entire length of the insertion tube.Inspect for any protruding objects or other irregularities." investigation found that the peeling was likely caused by stress of repeated use, external factors or handling.However, the root cause could not be specified.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRACHEAL INTUBATION FIBERSCOPE
Common Device Name
TRACHEAL INTUBATION FIBERSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key18508392
Report Number9610595-2024-00854
Device Sequence Number12750226
Product Code EOQ
UDI-Device Identifier04953170061998
UDI-Public04953170061998
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K981543
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/09/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberLF-GP
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/25/2023
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/26/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/26/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/12/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/09/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/07/2006
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-