| Model Number |
LOGIC CR TIB INSERT SLOPE++, SZ 5, 13MM |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Unstable (1667); Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); Synovitis (2094); Osteolysis (2377); Joint Laxity (4526); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
| Date of Event |
12/18/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section d10: concomitant products.Patella 3 peg 35mm (cat# 200-02-35/ serial# (b)(6)).Additional information, including the product investigation, will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported, approximately six years post initial right tka, the 67 y/o patient returned to surgeon's office with complaints of pain, swelling, instability, and dissatisfaction with their tka.The patient has a recalled poly implant.Upon examination, the patient was scheduled to have a revision tka possible poly swap vs full revision.The patient underwent a poly insert swap and patella implant swap.It was noted that the patient had extensive synovitis due to poly wear debris that required a synovectomy.Bone loss behind the lateral posterior/distal condyle required bone graft substitute.Patient was revised to revised truliant crc tibial insert sz 5 17mm and optetrak 3 peg patella 35mm.The patient left the or stable.Also, the initial tibial poly insert opened for replacement (17mm crc) had difficulty inserting and locking properly.This implant was removed and a new 17mm crc poly was opened that did insert and lock appropriately.There was no breakage of device of surgical delay/prolongation.Patient was last known to be in stable condition following the event.Images received.Sales rep was unable to obtain x-rays.The devices are not available for evaluation due to the implant(s) were sent to the lab and legal at the hospital.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.The revision reported was likely the result of tibial insert prosthesis wear, which was confirmed by the provided images, or instability.Additionally, the sequence of events as related to the reported wear and instability cannot be confirmed and the contributions of each to the reported event cannot be determined.Additional reasons for the reported revision may be inclusion of the polyethylene in the packaging recall.Potential contributions of user and patient-related considerations to the event could not be assessed as the devices were not available for evaluation and radiographs and relevant clinical information were not provided.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay corrected information.The following sections were corrected: h6 clinical code.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|