• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC CT LUCIA; CT LUCIA 602

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC CT LUCIA; CT LUCIA 602 Back to Search Results
Model Number 602
Medical Device Problem Codes Optical Decentration (1360); Off-Label Use (1494); Use of Device Problem (1670)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Visual Impairment (2138)
Date of Event 12/15/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a ct lucia 602 lens could not be centered after using the yamane technique for implantation.The lens was explanted during the same surgery.The patient was left aphakic.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
It was stated by the customer that they are using the yamane technique to implant the lenses.This technique induces a larger amount of force while trying to position the haptics in the scleral tunnel.Our lenses are intended to be implanted in the capsular bag.Additionally, the customer stated the emerald cartridge was used for implantation of the lens.Our lenses are intended to be used with zeiss specifically recommended accessory support devices.Thus, the lens was being used off-label.There was no damage reported to have been noticed during the inspection prior to use and preparation, which suggests a product deficiency did not contribute to the reported difficulties.Based on the information provided, the risk assessment for the lucia product, and our experience, we have determined that the following factors may have caused or contributed to the reported issue, but are not limited to: · lens placement technique.· loading strategy.· accessory device support.· poor handling during folding and inserting.The device history records were reviewed and there were no non-conformities or deviations noted during the manufacturing of the lens that would have caused or contributed to the nature of this complaint.Additionally, our lenses are 100% inspected before they leave our manufacturing site.Therefore, we are confident that the lens was processed per standard operating procedures and inspections and have met all criteria for release.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Description of changes: field d9: updated to "yes", checked "returned to manufacturer".Field g3: updated "date received by manufacturer" field g6: updated to "follow-up, # 1", checked "30 days".Field h2: selected "device evaluation" field h3: updated to "yes".Field h6: added "type of investigation" code 10.Field h11: added description of changes.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CT LUCIA
Common Device Name
CT LUCIA 602
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC
1040 s. vintage ave. bld. a
ontario CA 91761
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC
1040 s. vintage ave. bld. a
ontario CA 91761
Manufacturer Contact
manjaya hegde
5300 central parkway
dublin, CA 94568
9252164697
MDR Report Key18530034
Report Number3010126268-2024-00013
Device Sequence Number15396776
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier00843045100935
UDI-Public(01)00843045100935(17)280229
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNY
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P10016-S008
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/08/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number602
Device Catalogue Number003500-0050-672
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/17/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/14/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-