• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. AZUR CX 35 DETACHABLE; VASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. AZUR CX 35 DETACHABLE; VASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number 45-751324
Medical Device Problem Code Premature Separation (4045)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/27/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
A search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation, and the investigation is ongoing.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental mdr will be submitted.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies premature coil detachment as a potential complication associated with the use of the device.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a splenic aneurysm embolization via femoral access into the celiac artery, and prior to inserting the new coil into the catheter, the physician made sure the catheter was flushed.As the coil was being advanced, it became stuck within the catheter.The physician could not advance the coil past a certain point, and during an attempt to retract the coil, the proximal portion of the coil would move but the distal portion would not move in tandem.The coil then became stuck in the catheter and detached from the pusher wire, and the catheter and coil were completely removed in their entirety from the patient.Another coil was used, and the physicians were able to deploy the coil.The physician finished coiling the outflow and inflow splenic artery with approximately 8 coils.The patient remained stable throughout and the procedure was a success.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation conclusion: the investigation of the returned coil system found the implant stretched at the proximal section and separated from the pusher.The investigation found that the implant's monofilament showed a tensile break shape at the tip, which is consistent with the device experiencing force that exceeded the strength of the monofilament causing the implant to separate from the pusher.The physical evaluation of the device could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the stretched implant but stretching is consistent with the device experiencing retraction forces over specification.The catheter used in the procedure was not returned for evaluation, so the investigation could not determine if it had caused or contributed to the reported complaint.
 
Event or Problem Description
Please see section h10 for investigation results.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AZUR CX 35 DETACHABLE
Common Device Name
VASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key18548514
Report Number2032493-2024-00068
Device Sequence Number9081165
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00812636021089
UDI-Public(01)00812636021089(11)230713(17)280630(10)0000392835
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K123384
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/12/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number45-751324
Device Lot Number0000392835
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/18/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/27/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/06/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/19/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/13/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight66 KG
-
-