• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/05/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2,a4,a5: unknown/ asked but not available.Section d6a: if implanted; give date: n/a.The intraocular lens was inserted and removed during the same procedure.Section d6b: if explanted; give date: n/a.The intraocular lens was inserted and removed during the same procedure.Section h3: other 81: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the preloaded monofocal intraocular lens (iol) had defective.There is no information about the replacement iol.Patient was fully recovered.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d-9: device available for evaluation: yes section d-9: device date returned to manufacturer: 24 jan 2024 section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: visual inspection of the handpiece found the plunger rod partially advanced and overriding the lens.A crack at the cartridge tip was observed.The lens was stuck in the cartridge and was unable to be removed to prevent any damage to the lens.No further evaluation was performed and no issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issue were observed.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search of complaints related to this production order was performed.Conclusion: the complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key18554702
Report Number3012236936-2024-00114
Device Sequence Number6402899
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731660
UDI-Public(01)05050474731660(17)250814
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCT
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/23/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/14/2025
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0155
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/29/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/15/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/22/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/23/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/14/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-