|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records was performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H10: d4 (expiration date: 08/2025).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the superior femoral artery via an ipsilateral approach, a resistance was felt, and the sheath was allegedly unable to be inserted.It was further reported that the tip of the dilator was allegedly ripped, and the guidewire was hooked into the tear.Reportedly, when the guidewire was removed from the tear, the tip of the dilator was allegedly found to be rusted at the tear.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|