• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC ROADRUNNER THE FIRM HYDROPHILIC WIRE GUIDE; DQX WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC ROADRUNNER THE FIRM HYDROPHILIC WIRE GUIDE; DQX WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Medical Device Problem Code Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping (2969)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/19/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
As reported by a distributor, a hair was noted within the sterile package of a roadrunner the firm hydrophilic wire guide.This was found within a distribution facility; therefore, there were no adverse effects to any patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
G4: pma/510(k)#: k182985.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Summary of event: as reported by a distributor, a hair was noted within the sterile package of a roadrunner the firm hydrophilic wire guide.This was found within a distribution facility; therefore, there were no adverse effects to any patient.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions (mi), and quality control (qc) procedures were conducted during the investigation.A inspection of the provided photo of the unused product was also conducted.The complainant device was not returned to cook for investigation.A photo of the device was provided.Examination of the photo showed a hair-like fiber sealed inside the package.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device history record found one relevant non-conformance on 3 devices; however, all affected product was scrapped, and the lot is inspected 100%.A review of complaint history found no additional complaints for this lot number.The product ifu states, "upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ a review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, ifu, and examination of a photo of the complainant device suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured out of specification.Although one relevant non-conformance was noted on the final lot, all non-conforming product was scrapped, there are 100% inspections in place to capture this non-conformance, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot-related complaints have been received from the field.Therefore, it was concluded that there is no evidence that additional non-conforming product exists in house or in the field.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that the cause of this failure was a manufacturing and quality control deficiency.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROADRUNNER THE FIRM HYDROPHILIC WIRE GUIDE
Common Device Name
DQX WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key18574549
Report Number1820334-2024-00117
Device Sequence Number7852817
Product Code DQX
UDI-Device Identifier00827002091054
UDI-Public(01)00827002091054(17)260607(10)15478458
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/15/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Expiration Date06/07/2026
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberRPC-35-260
Device Lot Number15478458
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/27/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/19/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/24/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/15/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/07/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-