• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS PROGRIP; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS PROGRIP; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC Back to Search Results
Model Number PP1509G
Medical Device Problem Code Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/11/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter, during a transabdominal preperitoneal (tapp) groin hernia procedure, the device was opened from the package, and it was found that the patch was broken in the middle.The device was not used.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter, during a transabdominal preperitoneal (tapp) groin hernia procedure, the product was opened, the mesh was disconnected in the middle; it had not yet been applied to the patient.Another device was used to complete the case.There was no patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was not returned, but a photo was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted that the image depicts the mesh, placed into its tyvek pouch.The tyvek pouch was open, the sealing track confirmed that the packaging was correctly sealed during the manufacturing.A hole of around 9 pores is visible on the mesh.It was reported that the mesh torn.The reported issue was confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device and a photo were available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted that the sample was returned with its original internal tyvek pouch only.The packaging was open.The sample was not contaminated.The mesh dimensions were found as expected.A hole of 2.3cm was found in the middle of the mesh; at 6.5 and 6cm from the edges of the mesh.This hole was not due to a knitting/heat setting or grip formation problem.The mesh seemed to have been cut.It was reported that the mesh was torn.The reported issue was confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGRIP
Common Device Name
MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS
116 avenue du formans
trevoux 01600
FR  01600
Manufacturer (Section G)
SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS
116 avenue du formans
trevoux 01600
FR   01600
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key18587805
Report Number9615742-2024-00123
Device Sequence Number8517430
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier10884521177635
UDI-Public10884521177635
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K220540
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/05/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberPP1509G
Device Catalogue NumberPP1509G
Device Lot NumberSVK1015X
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/11/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/01/2024
03/25/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/26/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/21/2024
04/07/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/25/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-