• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA BRONCHOFIBERVIDEOSCOPE; BRONCHOVIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA BRONCHOFIBERVIDEOSCOPE; BRONCHOVIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number BF-XP160F
Medical Device Problem Code Peeled/Delaminated (1454)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to olympus for evaluation and in addition to the reportable findings documented in b5, non-reportable findings are as follows; bending section cover was perforated; bending section cover glues wore out; and there was water invasion traces in the video connector.The investigation is ongoing and follow up with the user facility is currently being performed.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation or if any additional information is provided by the user facility.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was observed that during the device evaluation, the bronchofibervideoscope exhibited peeling from the coating of the connecting tube.There was no patient involved.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide the results of the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record and historical complaints analysis was conducted and no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue was identified.Based on the results of the investigation a definitive root cause could not be determined.However is likely that coating at insertion section peeled off, was due to applying the following stress to the insertion section: physical stress such as by rubbing/ hitting the insertion section.Chemical stress from reprocessing not recommended by instruction for use (reprocessing manual).Stress from inferior storage environment (in direct sunlight, at high temperatures, in high humidity or exposed to x-rays and/or ultraviolet-rays, etc.).The event can be prevented by following the instructions for use which state: 3.2 inspection of the endoscope.5.Inspect the external surface of the entire insertion section, including the bending section and the distal end for dents, bulges, swelling, scratches, peeling off coating, holes, sagging, transformations, bends, adhesion of foreign bodies, missing parts, protruding objects, or other irregularities.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS EXERA BRONCHOFIBERVIDEOSCOPE
Common Device Name
BRONCHOVIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key18588943
Report Number9610595-2024-01723
Device Sequence Number20617891
Product Code EOQ
UDI-Device Identifier04953170340116
UDI-Public04953170340116
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K033225
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/14/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberBF-XP160F
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/10/2024
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/26/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/07/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/26/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/14/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/12/2012
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-