| Catalog Number |
387.347 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Mechanical Problem (1384); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/15/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.D9: complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation but has yet to be received.H3, h6: the investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6), 2024, a surgeon performed an alif procedure.Synframe ring clamps were part of the synframe that hold the retractor blades.The ring clamps were slipping after tightening down the retractor blades in situ under pressure.We do not time the surgical cases; the average time for an alif is 60 minutes, and the xase took 60 minutes.The surgeon had to readjust the retractor blades involving the ring clamps, and han-held retraction was utilized.The procedure was successfully completed.There weren't any adverse consequences that affected the patient because of the reported event.This report is for one (1)synframe ring clamp this is report 8 of 8 (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.The photo was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned photo.Visual analysis of the photo revealed that synframe ring clamp had scratches on the device and signs of wear due to usage.Functionality issues cannot be assessed though a photo investigation.No other issues were identified.The overall complaint was confirmed for synframe ring clamp.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.The product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that synframe ring clamp was observed with scratches on the surface device and signs of wear due to usage.It is reasonable that the spring mechanism could be worn as well.The observed condition was consistent as an end of life indicator for the device.The device exhibits damage consistent with repeated use over 21 years.The lifecycle requirements of the device are event related and depend on the use and inspection of the device in clinical practice.As the device can be damaged on the first or 100th use, the device must be properly inspected prior to each surgical use.Refer to the device/country specific ifu for information related to end of life, reprocessing instructions, and inspection procedures.A dimensional inspection for the synframe ring clamp was not performed due to post manufacturing damage.A functional test was performed tightened the handle and the device affixed appropriately, however the mating device was not received for asses the reported condition of loose.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed worn condition of synframe ring clamp would have contributed to the complained issue.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.It was determined that the reusable instrument was worn from repeated use and servicing.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Drawing/specifications reviewed? reviewed dimensional inspection: n/a device history lot part# 387.347, lot # 1168736, manufacturing site: werk hägendorf , supplier: na, release to warehouse date: 10 mar 2003 , expiration date: na.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished article lot and no non-conformances were identified.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|