• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL HD EPSCP,4.0,30,175,CW_STORZ; ARTHROSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL HD EPSCP,4.0,30,175,CW_STORZ; ARTHROSCOPE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 242006
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Use of Device Problem (1670)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported by the affiliate in switzerland that preoperatively to an unknown surgical procedure on an unknown date, it was observed that the arthroscope device did not work.During in-house engineering evaluation, it was determined that the device was deformed/bent and chipped/shaved/delaminated.It was unknown if and how the procedure was completed.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).Investigation summary: the complaint device was received at the service center and evaluated.During the service evaluation the following defects were identified: deformed/bent, chipped/shaved/delaminated per service reports, this complaint can be confirmed.The tube, lenses were replaced to resolve the issues.After repair, the device was found to be working according to the specifications.As part of depuy mitek¿s quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The faulty parts was identified as the root cause for the device failure during the service evaluation.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Device history review: manufacturing record evaluation is not required as the reported event is not associated with the manufacturing process and/or the potential cause of the defect cannot be associated to manufacturing.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HD EPSCP,4.0,30,175,CW_STORZ
Common Device Name
ARTHROSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle MA CH-24 00
SZ   CH-2400
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
3035526892
MDR Report Key18625815
Report Number1221934-2024-00340
Device Sequence Number7889322
Product Code HRX
UDI-Device Identifier10886705028740
UDI-Public10886705028740
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountrySZ
PMA/510(K) Number
K080560
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number242006
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/25/2024
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/31/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/01/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/22/2017
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-