|
ETHICON INC. SURGICEL ORIGINAL 4INX8IN(10.2CMX20.3CM); AGENT, ABSORBABLE HEMOSTATIC, NON-COLLAGEN BASED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
1952 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Pain (1994)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).H6.Component code: g07002 - device not returned.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.1.Please provide the following patient demographic information, if available: age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure? 2.What is the date of index surgical procedure? 3.What were the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? 4.Please provide any relevant patient history: patient pre-existing medical conditions (i.E.Allergies, history of reactions), all concomitant medications, past medical history, any treatment required for events, dose, frequency, and therapy dates.5.Was there any intraoperative concurrent use of other products? 6.What is the lot number? 7.What was the intended use of the surgicel? was it used to address active bleeding or used prophylactically? 8.Where was the surgicel used (on what tissue)? 9.How was the surgicel used, was it wadded up? 10.How much surgicel was used during the procedure? 11.What were current symptoms following the index surgical procedure? onset date? 12.What is physician¿s opinion as to the cause of or contributing factors to this event? 13.Was there an alleged deficiency of the surgicel that contributed to the patient¿s post-operative pain? 14.What is the patient¿s current status? 15.What is the users experience w/ surgicel original and other hemostatic agents? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an ortho spine procedure on an unknown date and absorbable hemostat was used.The absorbable hemostat was retained prevent hematoma, and the operating side successful.Upon two week follow up the patient experienced pain on the opposite side and requested the surgeon go back in to remove the absorbable hemostat.The surgeon removed the excess product and patient recovered with no further concerns.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: 1.Please provide the following patient demographic information, if available: age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure? male 48 years, 130 kg.2.What is the date of index surgical procedure? (b)(6) 2023 emergency l5/s1 decompression and discectomy.3.What were the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? cauda equina.Patient presented with bowel incontinence and significant urinary retention, saddle anesthesia, left leg radiculopathy, chronic left ankle paralysis 4.Please provide any relevant patient history: patient pre-existing medical conditions (i.E.Allergies, history of reactions), all concomitant medications, past medical history, any treatment required for events, dose, frequency, and therapy dates.No allergies.Mrsa positive.5.Was there any intraoperative concurrent use of other products? no.6.What is the lot number? not recorded.7.How much surgicel was used during the procedure? we stock the 4x8¿ sheet (ref1952).We normally cut into 1/3 pieces.Or recorded only recorded a quantity of 1.Unsure if it was cut or whole.11.What were current symptoms following the index surgical procedure? onset date? left leg radicular symptoms completely resolved, resolution of bowel incontinence and urinary retention, normal saddle sensation, left ankle strength improvement, worsening right leg radicular pain symptoms and right ankle weakness (b)(6) 2024 emergency removal of surgicel and revision l5/s1 decompression.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|