|
EXACTECH, INC. ACUMATCH A-SERIES CONNEXION GXL; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
MCS GXL LINER 5/15 DEG 5458X32 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Fracture (1260); Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Pain (1994)
|
| Date of Event |
01/10/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information, including the product investigation, will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a 76 yo male patient, initial right hip implanted on november 10, 2020, underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2024, approximately 3 years 2 months post the initial procedure.The patient presented with pain.Radiographs showed wear.The surgeon decided to revise.No replacement liners were available, so the surgeon cemented a competitor¿s liner in the existing mcs cup.He put a replacement exactech 11/13 ball on the existing stem.The liner was cracked upon surgical dissection.All parts and pieces were removed.It appeared that the liner was not seated properly as the dome locking tab was sheared off.No surgical delays were reported.X-rays were provided.The patient was last known to be in stable condition following the event.No device returns for analysis anticipated.The devices were sent to pathology at the hospital per their protocol.Device images were provided.No further information.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3: the revision reported may have been the result of pain, prosthesis wear, and prosthesis fracture, as stated in the experience report.The prothesis wear and fracture may have been due to a combination of risk factors specified in the hhe, including but not limited to use error, implant positioning, and patient factors.The patient involved in this case meets the following risk criteria for early wear as specified in the hhe: significant edge loading of the femoral head on the acetabular liner.However, this cannot be confirmed because the devices were not available for evaluation and the extent of the prosthesis wear cannot be determined from the images provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay corrected information.The following sections were corrected: d1, h6 problem code, component code, investigation findings, investigation conclusions.The revision reported may have been the result of pain, prosthesis wear, and prosthesis fracture, as stated in the experience report.The prothesis wear and fracture may have been due to a combination of risk factors including but not limited to use error, implant positioning, and patient factors.The patient involved in this case meets the following risk criteria for early wear: significant edge loading of the femoral head on the acetabular liner.However, this cannot be confirmed because the devices were not available for evaluation and the extent of the prosthesis wear cannot be determined from the images provided.Should additional relevant information be obtained, a follow-up mdr will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|