|
Visual inspection: during the investigation, some residue tissues on the shunt system was determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that all components are permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the progav 2.0 operates within the accepted tolerance in the horizontal position.The shuntassistant 2.0 does not operate within the specified tolerances in the horizontal position.A reduced outflow of shuntassistant 2.0 could be determined.Adjustment test: the progav 2.0 was tested and is not adjustable.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function operates as expected.However, the breaking force cannot be measured due to the non-adjustability of the valve.Internal inspection : after dismantling of the valves, no deposits were found in both valves.Result: based on our test results, we can determine a reduced outflow at the shuntassistant 2.0 and a non- adjustability of the progav 2.0 valve.The deposits visible in the valve may have led to the functional deviations.Deposits caused by substances naturally present in the patient's body, such as protein, blood or tissue particles, are among the known and unavoidable risks and side effects of hydrocephalus therapy.Even small amounts of organic material can affect the integrity of the shuntsystem.
|