| Catalog Number |
012013 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/18/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: internal complaint reference (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a knee arthroscopy, the clamp of the punch basket broke when the user forced it to enter the cavity.There was no damage to the patient's health.The procedure was successfully completed without surgical delay using the same faulty device.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10, h6: a device deficiency was not identified, and the root cause of the reported event could not be determined since the device was not returned for evaluation.The provided product identification information did not match any known release of this part and thus a manufacturing record review could not be conducted.Based on the information available, there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.Please refer to the instructions for use for precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10; internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection of the returned device finds the device returned with the actuator bar fractured away from the cutting jaw.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A definitive root cause for the reported issue could not be determined.Factors that could have contributed to the failure include procedural variance, or deviations from established protocols, increasing risks and leading to unintended consequences.Other factors include excessive force to the device, an impact event inconsistent with normal use, wear from prolonged use, rough handling, or inadequate routine maintenance.Based on this investigation, there is no evidence to suggest a design, material, or manufacturing issue.Therefore, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|