• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND ONYX FRONTIER; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND ONYX FRONTIER; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Model Number ONYXNG30034UX
Medical Device Problem Codes Difficult to Insert (1316); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Difficult to Open or Remove Packaging Material (2922); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Material Deformation (2976)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/24/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
An attempt was made to use one onyx frontier drug eluting stent to treat a moderately tortuous, mildly calcified lesion with 100% chronic total occlusion (cto) in the left anterior descending (lad) artery.The device was not inspected.Negative prep was performed with no issues noted.The lesion was predilated.The device did not pass through a previously-deployed stent.Resistance was encountered when advancing the device.Excessive force was not used during delivery.It was reported that stent dislodgement occurred during delivery to/at lesion.It was detailed that during delivery of the stent resistance was felt within the guide catheter as the stent advanced past the trapper balloon.A second wire that was in the diagonal branch was pulled out.The onyx frontier stent was then removed and as the stent was removed back through the guide catheter and the hemostatic valve it was noticed that the stent had dislodged from the stent delivery system (sds) and the stent had unraveled.The device was not kinked and re-straightened during use.The dislodged stent was removed from the guide catheter as it was never delivered into the coronary artery.It was also stated that the device or component detached, cracked, or fractured during advancement through the guide catheter.It was noted that there were issues when removing the device from the hoop/tray.It was observed that the stylet and protective sleeve may have been removed over the stent too aggressively during prep and could have damaged the stent before it entered the patient.Another same size onyx frontier stent was used to treat the vessel with no issues.The patient is alive with no injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: the launcher device was inspected and prepped per ifu before use with no issues noted.The stent did not detach into two separate pieces.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis summary: the device was returned to medtronic for evaluation.A kink was evident to the hypotube.The stent was not present on the balloon but did return for analysis.Deformation was evident to the stent with struts raised, bunched and stretched.The balloon folds remained intact.The proximal balloon pillow was bunched.Crimp impressions were visible on the exposed balloon surface.No other damage evident to the remainder of the device.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: the lesion was in the mid left anterior descending (lad) artery.The stent dislodgement occurred during delivery to/at lesion during advancement through the 6f launcher guide catheter.The sheath was removed per ifu.The guidewire and trapper balloon used were non medtronic devices.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ONYX FRONTIER
Common Device Name
STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key18685805
Report Number9612164-2024-00732
Device Sequence Number20641421
Product Code NIQ
UDI-Device Identifier00763000511524
UDI-Public00763000511524
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOR
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P160043
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/11/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/13/2026
Device Model NumberONYXNG30034UX
Device Catalogue NumberONYXNG30034UX
Device Lot Number0011818993
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/24/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/12/2024
03/04/2024
04/09/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/12/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/16/2024
03/25/2024
04/11/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/14/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-