| Catalog Number |
SK15018 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Material Puncture/Hole (1504); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/14/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10 : as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, photos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 01/2025).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in right femoral artery, the guidewire allegedly failed to pass through the support catheter.It was further reported that the guidewire allegedly poked out at the half-section of the support catheter.Reportedly, the support catheter was allegedly broken.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.Three photos were provided and reviewed.The first photo shows the seeker device within its packaging.The labeling matches with the information available in trackwise.The catheter shaft is seen completely detached in two segments.The second and third photos also show the catheter shaft of the device completely detached in two segments.Therefore, the investigation is unconfirmed for the reported break and material hole but confirmed for the identified detachment as the catheter shaft was seen completely detached.The investigation is also inconclusive for the reported device-device incompatibility as functional testing for the same could not be performed.A definitive root cause for the reported break, material hole, device-device incompatibility and identified detachment could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: b5, d4 (expiration date: 01/2025), g3, h6 (device, method).H11: h6 (result, conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the right femoral artery via the retrograde approach, the guidewire allegedly failed to pass through the support catheter.It was further reported that the guidewire allegedly got poked out at the half-section of the support catheter.Reportedly, the support catheter was allegedly broken.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|