|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 12/2025).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.One electronic photo was provided and it was reviewed.In that provided photo, three product labels were shown; in that product labeling the mentioned lot and catalogue details were matches with tw details & also it is belongs to dualok localization wire but the product packaging information states the magnum biopsy needle information.Based on the photo review, the reported failure can be confirmed.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported device markings / labelling problem issue as the product packaging information states the magnum needle and the label information states the dualok localization wire in the provided photo for review.A definitive root cause for the alleged device markings / labelling problem issue is determined to be manufacturing related.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) found that the product labeling was inadequate.By comparing the received label sticker against document "(b)(4)" (rev.3), it was noted that everything mentioned in the product label sticker was verified and it matched with the document.By comparing the received pouch against document "(b)(4)" (rev.2), it was noted that the product name, copyright information and pk number which was mentioned in the pouch was incorrect.The information which was mentioned in the received pouch was belongs to the magnum biopsy device (as the product was dualok localization wire).H10: d4 (expiration date: 12/2025).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|