|
|
| Catalog Number |
J555G |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Inflammation (1932)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown surgical procedure on the eye and suture was used.Post-op, the patient presented with inflammation.The surgeon prescribed steroids to control the inflammation.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H6 component code: g07002 device not returned.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure date and name of index surgical procedure on the eye? the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? on what tissue was the suture used? what was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? how was the suture placed (interrupted or continuous)? how was the suture originally tied (multiple knots, square knot, etc.)? what symptoms did the patient experience following the index surgical procedure? onset date? please describe any medical/surgical intervention required for this suture event including dates and results.Does the surgeon prescribe a standard post-op prophylactic care? if yes, please describe.Were post-op instructions followed by the patient? did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? were any pre-op cleansing procedures changed recently? if yes, please describe.Other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient's current status? will the product be returned? if so, please provide the return date and tracking information.Note: related events: 2210968-2024-01421, and 2210968-2024-01422.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional h3 investigation summary: the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.The returned product determined that it was received three unopened samples that pertain to the product code j555, lot sbmcxs.In order to evaluate the condition of the returned samples, the packets were examined for visual defects: appearance, color package, wrinkles in the seal area, continuous seals, seal margins, over-sealing, damage (torn, punctured) and none was observed.The packets were opened, and the swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.The sutures were correctly placed on the winding former.The sutures were dispensed without problems and examined along the strand and no anomalies or damage could be observed during evaluation.Also, the functional test was performed using an instron equipment, the pull force and tensile force were above the minimum requirements.As part of the ethicon quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.No conclusion could be reached on the cause of the reported event.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device sbmcxs / j555g65 batch number, and no non-conformances were identified.Expiration date: jan/31/2027.Date of mfg.: feb/9/2022.The product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.The returned product determined that it was received three unopened samples that pertain to the product code j544, lot rpmjkt.In order to evaluate the condition of the returned samples, the packets were examined for visual defects: appearance, color package, wrinkles in the seal area, continuous seals, seal margins, over-sealing, damage (torn, punctured) and none was observed.The packets were opened, and the swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.The sutures were correctly placed on the winding former.The sutures were dispensed without problems and examined along the strand and no anomalies or damage could be observed during evaluation.Also, the functional test was performed using an instron equipment, the pull force and tensile force were above the minimum requirements.As part of the ethicon quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.No conclusion could be reached on the cause of the reported event.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device rpmjkt / j544g batch number, and no non-conformances were identified.Expiration date: nov/30/2026.Date of mfg.: dec/29/2021.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: were these 2 lot numbers (sbmcxs, rpmjkt) returned as extra representative samples? yes.Were these 2 lot numbers (sbmcxs, rpmjkt) just removed from the shelf for testing purposes? yes.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # = > (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: surgeon stated that some patients needed long doses of steroids.Investigation summary = > the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.Visual inspection was conducted on the returned device.The returned sample determined that it was received one unopened sample.In order to evaluate the condition of the returned sample, the packet was examined for visual defects: appearance, color package, wrinkles in the seal area, continuous seals, seal margins, over-sealing, damage (torn, punctured) and none was observed.The packet was opened, and the swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.During the visual inspection, the suture was correctly placed on the winding former.The suture was dispensed without problems and examined along the strand and no anomalies or damage on the suture surface could be observed.As part of the ethicon quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.No conclusion could be reached on the cause of the reported event.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|