| Model Number |
1068224 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Pain (1994)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that.The patient stated that the device is cumbersome.The sflx coil 5 is too big and the sflx coil 4 is too small.The device is keeping her up at night.The patient stated that her leg hurts while she was treating, but not all the time.The patient has not increased her daily activity.The pain is below the skin's surface.The patient did not speak to her doctor.The patient does not want to have surgery again.The pain level is a 4.The patient has an appointment with her doctor at the end of march.An extra velcro was sent to try to keep the coil in place.It was later reported that the patient was switched from the bhs assembly to the orthopak assembly by her physician.This is considered medical intervention and this complaint is considered reportable.The patient later reported that she had pain with the sflx 5 coil.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Without a product return, no product evaluation is able to be conducted.The lot number is unknown; therefore the device history records are unable to be reviewed.Current information is insufficient to permit a valid conclusion about the cause of this event.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report and/or a conclusion can be drawn, a follow-up report will be sent.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information - d9: device available for evaluation and returned to manufacturer date, g3, h2, h3, h4: device manufacture date.The sflx 5 coil was received for evaluation.A visual inspection of the customer returned product was performed.Included was one sflx 5 coil part no.1068224 with julian date 15041.The part appeared to be in good condition from the cosmetic/visual point of view.The dhr for the sflx 5 coil was reviewed in the product information section and there were no reports of non-conformances or deviations.Calibration information: all tests inspections were completed using tektronix oscilloscope id (b)(4) with calibration due on may 20, 2025; tf0804.C08 which does not require calibration.Test/inspections were completed by the quality department on july 8, 2024.The failure was not confirmed for the reported condition of "pain with bhs and coil".The coil was tested and operates as intended.Review of complaint history identified (1) total complaints from (jan 16, 2023) to (jan 16, 2024) for pn (1068224) and events related to (pain).Keyword search criteria: (complaint code: medical: pain) the search could not be specified further because the main complaint was pain.Review of the information provided by the customer and the findings from the investigation indicated that no physical and/or device functional condition could be found that could be considered a causal factor for the reported complaint of "pain".No failure and/or fault condition could be found and confirmed.Therefore, no further actions are required at this time.Highridge medical will continue to monitor for trends.Device usage: this device is used for treatment.A follow-up report will be sent if additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that.The patient stated that the device is cumbersome.The sflx coil 5 is too big and the sflx coil 4 is too small.The device is keeping her up at night.The patient stated that her leg hurts while she was treating, but not all the time.The patient has not increased her daily activity.The pain is below the skin's surface.The patient did not speak to her doctor.The patient does not want to have surgery again.The pain level is a 4.The patient has an appointment with her doctor at the end of march.An extra velcro was sent to try to keep the coil in place.It was later reported that the patient was switched from the bhs assembly to the orthopak assembly by her physician.This is considered medical intervention and this complaint is considered reportable.The patient later reported that she had pain with the sflx 5 coil.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that.The patient stated that the device is cumbersome.The sflx coil 5 is too big and the sflx coil 4 is too small.The device is keeping her up at night.The patient stated that her leg hurts while she was treating, but not all the time.The patient has not increased her daily activity.The pain is below the skin's surface.The patient did not speak to her doctor.The patient does not want to have surgery again.The pain level is a 4.The patient has an appointment with her doctor at the end of march.An extra velcro was sent to try to keep the coil in place.It was later reported that the patient was switched from the bhs assembly to the orthopak assembly by her physician.This is considered medical intervention and this complaint is considered reportable.The patient later reported that she had pain with the sflx 5 coil.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Udi related data quality updates only - a supplemental report is being submitted to address the discrepancies between fda medwatch form 3500a and gudid.Corrections: d1: brand name, d2a: device common name, d4: model number, g4: pma/510(k)#, h4: device manufacture date, h5: labeled for single use, h6: evaluation codes.Additional information: b4: date of this report, g3: date received by manufacturer.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|