|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. 24MM KATALYST RADIAL HEAD; PROSTHESIS, ELBOW, HEMI-, RADIAL, POLYMER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
221424 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth (4002)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); Joint Dislocation (2374); Joint Laxity (4526); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
|
| Date of Event |
01/13/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, patient underwent a primary left catalyst bipolar radial system on (b)(6) 2022 due to fracture.He was in pain in the elbow and began having pain in the wrist.He was found to have a filed radial head arthroplasty with loose hardware.He also was found to have shortened of the radius relative the ulna.This adverse event was addressed by revision surgery on (b)(6 2023, in which the 24mm catalyst radial head and 7.5mm catalyst stem were explanted.Found to be significant arthritis of the capitellum.There was significant amount of metallosis within the synovium of the joint.X-rays of the radiocapitellar joint demonstrated good alignment of the implant with no overstuffing.X-rays of the wrist demonstrated improvement of the ulnar variance although there is still some residual ulnar positivity.The elbow was taken through range of motion and found to be stable.The patient was awakened from anesthesia and the tourniquet was deflated.Brought back to the postoperative care unit in stable condition.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section h3, h6: the devices were not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that x-rays ((b)(6) 2023) showed that the revised head had disassociated from the stem.The root cause of the reported radial head disassociation is likely multifactorial given the patient¿s chronic essex-lopresti injury with persistent ulnar positivity, ulnocarpal abutment syndrome and distal radioulnar joint instability, as these are known sources of pain, clicking (popping), limited range of motion and tissue degeneration.The surgeon documentation indicated discussions with the patient regarding potential staged future interventions to address the ulnar variance/ulnocarpal abutment but noted that the patient possibly will not return to baseline.The patient impact included the reported symptoms, component disassociation and subsequent revision.A review of the production orders did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part numbers over the past 12 months and for the batch numbers based on historical data of the devices did not reveal similar events for the listed devices.A review of the instructions for use documents for katalyst¿ bipolar radial head system revealed that as with all internal fracture fixation devices, potential adverse effects include loosening or change in position of the implant or its components.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to these products and event.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the products failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include traumatic injury, size selected or abnormal loading of limb.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.B7: other relevant history, including preexisting medical conditions (e.G.,allergies,race,pregnancy,smoking and alcohol use, hepatic/renal dysfunction, etc.) h6: health effect - clinical code and medical device problem code.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The associated devices were returned and evaluated.Visual evaluation of the 24mm katalyst radial head found some signs of wear expected from normal use.The top and base of the implant had scratches.There was some minor knicks along the edges of the opening on the base of the implant.Also, visual evaluation of the 7.5mm katalyst stem did note some damage (knicks/scratches) to the sides and ball joint of the implant.Some damage to the porous surface as visible, this is most likely from implantation and subsequent removal.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that x-rays (b)(6) 2023) showed that the revised head had disassociated from the stem.The root cause of the reported radial head disassociation is likely multifactorial given the patient¿s chronic essex-lopresti injury with persistent ulnar positivity, ulnocarpal abutment syndrome and distal radioulnar joint instability, as these are known sources of pain, clicking (popping), limited range of motion and tissue degeneration.The surgeon documentation indicated discussions with the patient regarding potential staged future interventions to address the ulnar variance/ulnocarpal abutment but noted that the patient possibly will not return to baseline.The patient impact included the reported symptoms, component disassociation and subsequent revision.A review of the production orders did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part numbers over the past 12 months and for the batch numbers based on historical data of the devices did not reveal similar events for the listed devices.A review of the instructions for use documents for katalyst¿ bipolar radial head system revealed that as with all internal fracture fixation devices, potential adverse effects include loosening or change in position of the implant or its components.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to these products and event.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the products failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include traumatic injury, size selected or abnormal loading of limb.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|