|
EXACTECH, INC. NV GXL LINR, NTRL, 28MM ID, GROUP 1 CUPS; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
NV GXL LINR, NTRL, 28MM ID, GROUP 1 CUPS |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Osteolysis (2377)
|
| Date of Event |
01/22/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section d10: concomitant products - element stem c'less w/ha std,12/150mm (cat# 164-01-12 / serial# (b)(6).- novation crown cup no-hole.50mm (cat# 180-00-50 / serial# (b)(6).Additional information, including the product investigation, will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported, approximately nine years post initial left tka, the female patient was revised due to a failed liner.A revision surgery was performed due to liner wear and osteolysis.All components were removed.There was no breakage of device or surgical delay/prolongation.Patient was last known to be in stable condition following the event.No other patient information was reported.Sales rep was unable to obtain photo/x-rays.The device is not available for evaluation due to they were disposed at hospital.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3: the revision reported may have been due to a combination of risk factors specified in the hhe, including but not limited to use error, implant positioning, and patient factors.However, this cannot be confirmed from the reported information and the devices were not available for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and corrected information.The following sections were updated: g3, h6 clincial and component codes added.The following sections were corrected: g1 contact name and email.Updated investigation results: the patient/gxl acetabular liner involved was reportedly revised due to prosthesis wear and osteolysis approximately 8.5 years after the index surgery.However, the revised components were not returned to exactech for evaluation and no images or radiographs were provided.The revision reported may have been due to a combination of risk factors specified in hhe including but not limited to use error, implant positioning, and patient factors.However, this cannot be confirmed from the reported information and the devices were not available for evaluation.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|